Feel into the shared trauma of our friends, enemies, and collaterals alike.
Originally posted March 5, 2009 on Integral Math.com We can’t talk about persons without distinquishing between singular and plural. This is done with the symbol *pl. Below is a comparision between singular and plural: 1p: me1p*pl: us 2p: you2p*pl: you (plural) 3p: George Bush3p*pl: The previous White House Administration Singular and plural are stratightforward concepts….
Read more
MPP part 4: Experience of: “x” (draft) Originally posted on March 3, 2009 on IntegralMath.com In this article, I discuss the concept of experience of, or interaction with two or more persons or perspectives. This is represented by the symbol of “x”, analogous to the multiplication sign in conventional mathematics. In a sense, it is…
Read more
IMPP part 3: Our Vantage Points: “1p(1p)”, “2p(1p)”, “3p(1p)” (draft) Article Originally published March 3, 2009 for IntegralMath.com We’ve identified the basic persons and basic assertions of Integral Mathematics of Primordial Perspectives (IMPP) in the last 2 posts. Now let’s examine the concept of vantage points. The easiest way to define our vantage point is whose eyes we…
Read more
Article originally published March 2, 2009 for IntegralMath.com In my last article on IMPP (Integral Mathematics of Primordial Perspectives), I described the three basic ‘persons’ that all of us as sentient beings can be broken down into. (Of course, I must add, the philosophy as to what constitutes a sentient being will be discussed at…
Read more
* * THIS ARTICLE WAS MIGRATED FROM THE “INTEGRALMATH.com” PROJECT, ORIGINALLY POSTED FEB 25, 2009. IMPP part 1: Basic Persons: “1p”, “2p”, “3p” (draft) Integral Mathematics of Primordial Perspectives (IMPP for short) is a form of mathematics that dissects the different points of views or perspectives we have. By teasing apart patterns in thought and…
Read more